Poco C75 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 Plus alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 Plus
Vivo Y300 Plus
-
Snapdragon 695
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
44W
-
6.78"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold
6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver
f/1.8, (wide)
Auxiliary lens
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8
TDD: N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N77, N78
In this comparison, the Poco C75 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Vivo Y300 Plus with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
They offer the same OS update support. When it comes to security updates, Poco C75 leads with 4 years of support.
Vivo Y300 Plus has a superior AMOLED display, while Poco C75 uses an LCD panel. They have the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo Y300 Plus also has a brighter display with 1300 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo Y300 Plus has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Poco C75 has a larger 5160 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo Y300 Plus supports faster wired charging at 44W.
Vivo Y300 Plus offers better water and dust resistance with an IP54 rating.