Poco M6 Plus alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A34 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Poco M6 Plus

Poco M6 Plus
-
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 AE
4 nm
-
5030 mAh
33W
-
6.79"
1080x2460 pixels
-
108 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
Samsung Galaxy A34

Samsung Galaxy A34
-
Dimensity 1080
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.6"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
48 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.75, 28mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP
(macro)
f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30/60fps
720p@480fps
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N7, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N7, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A34 with its Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6nm) performs better than the Poco M6 Plus with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 AE (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy A34 offers 4 years of OS updates, whereas Poco M6 Plus provides 2 years. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy A34 offers 5 years of support compared to Poco M6 Plus's 4 years.
Samsung Galaxy A34 features a superior AMOLED display, while Poco M6 Plus comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Samsung Galaxy A34 also boasts a brighter screen with 1000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Poco M6 Plus comes with a larger 5030 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Poco M6 Plus also supports faster wired charging at 33W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy A34.
Samsung Galaxy A34 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP67 rating.
- Poco M6 Plus – Check price here
- Samsung Galaxy A34 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.