Poco M7 Plus alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
vivo T4 Ultra alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Poco M7 Plus

Poco M7 Plus
-
Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
6 nm
-
7000 mAh
33W
-
6.9"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
vivo T4 Ultra

vivo T4 Ultra
-
Dimensity 9300+
4 nm
-
5500 mAh
90W
-
6.67"
1260 x 2800 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4
3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens
Sony IMX921, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
Sony IMX882, f/2.6, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF (15cm - ∞), OIS, 3x optical zoom
8 MP
GalaxyCore GC08A8, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
1080p
f/2.0, (wide)
GalaxyCore GC32E1, f/2.45, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n20, n28, n40, n78
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n26, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the vivo T4 Ultra with its Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) performs better than the Poco M7 Plus with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
vivo T4 Ultra offers 3 years of OS updates, whereas Poco M7 Plus provides 2 years. Both phones receive the same 4 years of security updates.
vivo T4 Ultra features a superior AMOLED display, while Poco M7 Plus comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Poco M7 Plus offers a higher 144 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. vivo T4 Ultra also boasts a brighter screen with 5000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, vivo T4 Ultra offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Poco M7 Plus comes with a larger 7000 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. vivo T4 Ultra also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 33W on Poco M7 Plus.
Both phones feature the same IP64 rating for water and dust resistance.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.