Poco M7 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A15 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A15

Samsung Galaxy A15
-
Dimensity 6100+
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.5"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
6GB 128GB
8GB 128GB
8GB 256GB
f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.96", PDAF
f/1.8, (wide), AF
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/2.0, (wide)
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N48, N66, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N26, N28, N66
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N48, N66, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N26, N28, N66
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Poco M7 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy A15 with the Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy A15 offers 4 years of OS updates, whereas Poco M7 provides 2 years. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy A15 offers 5 years of support compared to Poco M7's 4 years.
Samsung Galaxy A15 features a superior AMOLED display, while Poco M7 comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Poco M7 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Poco M7 also boasts a brighter screen with 600 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Samsung Galaxy A15 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Poco M7 comes with a larger 5160 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Samsung Galaxy A15 also supports faster wired charging at 25W, compared to 18W on Poco M7.
Poco M7 includes an IP52 rating, while Samsung Galaxy A15 lacks an official IP rating.
- Poco M7 – Check price here
- Samsung Galaxy A15 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.