Poco X6 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Spark 30C alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Poco X6 Pro

Poco X6 Pro
-
Dimensity 8300
4 nm
-
5000 mAh
67W
-
6.67"
1220x2712 pixels
-
64 MP
4K@24/30fps
-
Specs
Tecno Spark 30C

Tecno Spark 30C
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
48 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715
3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 256GB (UFS 4.0)
12GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
4GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
(wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N48, N77, N78
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N48, N77, N78
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
In this performance comparison, the Poco X6 Pro with its Mediatek Dimensity 8300 (4nm) performs better than the Tecno Spark 30C with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Poco X6 Pro features a superior AMOLED display, while Tecno Spark 30C comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Poco X6 Pro offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Poco X6 Pro also supports faster wired charging at 67W, compared to 18W on Tecno Spark 30C.
Both phones feature the same IP54 rating for water and dust resistance.
- Poco X6 Pro – Check price here
- Tecno Spark 30C – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.