Poco X7 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30/60/120fps
1080p
f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.7µm
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N48, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N48, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo X200 with its Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Poco X7 with the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo X200 offers 4 years of OS updates, whereas Poco X7 provides 3 years. For security updates, Vivo X200 offers 5 years of support compared to Poco X7's 4 years.
Both Poco X7 and Vivo X200 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo X200 also boasts a brighter screen with 4500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo X200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo X200 features a larger 5800 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo X200 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 45W on Poco X7.
Both phones feature the same IP69 rating for water and dust resistance.
- Poco X7 – Check price here
- Vivo X200 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.