Realme Narzo 80 Lite alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F14 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Realme Narzo 80 Lite

Realme Narzo 80 Lite
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
6000 mAh
15W
-
6.67"
720 x 1604 pixels
-
32 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
Samsung Galaxy F14 4G

Samsung Galaxy F14 4G
-
Snapdragon 680
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080x2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265
1.9 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265
6GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/3.1", PDAF
f/1.8, (wide)
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/2.0, (wide)
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Realme Narzo 80 Lite with its Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy F14 4G with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F14 4G offers 2 years of OS updates, while Realme Narzo 80 Lite does not have confirmed OS update information. Samsung Galaxy F14 4G receives 4 years of security updates, while Realme Narzo 80 Lite does not have confirmed security update information.
Both Realme Narzo 80 Lite and Samsung Galaxy F14 4G use LCD screens. In terms of smoothness, Realme Narzo 80 Lite offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy F14 4G offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Realme Narzo 80 Lite comes with a larger 6000 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Samsung Galaxy F14 4G also supports faster wired charging at 25W, compared to 15W on Realme Narzo 80 Lite.
Realme Narzo 80 Lite includes an IP64 rating, while Samsung Galaxy F14 4G lacks an official IP rating.
- Realme Narzo 80 Lite – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.