Redmi 13 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A35 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A35
Samsung Galaxy A35
-
Exynos 1380
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.6"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP
(depth)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.5, (wide)
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
7 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n78
12 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n26, n28, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A35 with its Exynos 1380 (5nm) performs better than the Redmi 13 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 AE (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy A35 launched with Android 14 and will receive updates until Android 18, whereas Redmi 13 launched with Android 14 and will get Android 16. Samsung Galaxy A35 will get security updates until 2029 (approx. 5 years), while Redmi 13 is supported till 2027.
Samsung Galaxy A35 features a superior AMOLED display, while Redmi 13 comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Samsung Galaxy A35 also boasts a brighter screen with 1000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Redmi 13 comes with a larger 5030 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Redmi 13 also supports faster wired charging at 33W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy A35.
Samsung Galaxy A35 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP67 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.