Redmi 13 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP
(depth)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.5, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
7 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41
In this performance comparison, the Redmi 13 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 AE (4nm) performs better than the Vivo Y300 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both phones launched with Android 14 and will get updates until Android 16. Both phones are expected to receive security updates until around 2027.
Vivo Y300 features a superior AMOLED display, while Redmi 13 comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo Y300 also boasts a brighter screen with 1800 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Redmi 13 comes with a larger 5030 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Vivo Y300 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 33W on Redmi 13.
Vivo Y300 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP64 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.