Redmi 13C 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F17 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Redmi 13C 4G
Redmi 13C 4G
-
Helio G85
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.74"
720x1600 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Samsung Galaxy F17
Samsung Galaxy F17
-
Exynos 1330
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
4GB 256GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 256GB (eMMC 5.1)
6GB 128GB
f/1.8, 28mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
0.08 MP
(auxiliary lens)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF, OIS, Up to 10x Digital Zoom
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro), 1/5.0", 1.75µm
gyro-EIS
f/2.0
f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n6, n7, n8, n26, n28, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy F17 with its Exynos 1330 (5nm) performs better than the Redmi 13C 4G with the Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F17 offers 6 years of OS updates, whereas Redmi 13C 4G provides 2 years. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy F17 offers 6 years of support compared to Redmi 13C 4G's 4 years.
Samsung Galaxy F17 features a superior AMOLED display, while Redmi 13C 4G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 90 Hz refresh rate. Samsung Galaxy F17 also boasts a brighter screen with 1100 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Samsung Galaxy F17 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy F17 also supports faster wired charging at 25W, compared to 18W on Redmi 13C 4G.
Samsung Galaxy F17 includes an IP54 rating, while Redmi 13C 4G lacks an official IP rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.