Redmi 13C 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Pova Slim alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Redmi 13C 4G

Redmi 13C 4G
-
Helio G85
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.74"
720x1600 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Tecno Pova Slim

Tecno Pova Slim
-
Dimensity 6400
6 nm
-
5160 mAh
45W
-
6.78"
1224 x 2720 pixels
-
50 MP
1440p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
4GB 256GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 256GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, 28mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
0.08 MP
(auxiliary lens)
f/1.79, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
1080p@30fps
f/2.0
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
In this performance comparison, the Tecno Pova Slim with its Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) performs better than the Redmi 13C 4G with the Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Redmi 13C 4G offers 2 years of OS updates, whereas Tecno Pova Slim provides 1 years. For security updates, Redmi 13C 4G offers 4 years of support compared to Tecno Pova Slim's 2 years.
Tecno Pova Slim features a superior AMOLED display, while Redmi 13C 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Tecno Pova Slim offers a higher 144 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Tecno Pova Slim also boasts a brighter screen with 4500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Tecno Pova Slim offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Tecno Pova Slim features a larger 5160 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Tecno Pova Slim also supports faster wired charging at 45W, compared to 18W on Redmi 13C 4G.
Tecno Pova Slim includes an IP64 rating, while Redmi 13C 4G lacks an official IP rating.
- Tecno Pova Slim – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.