Redmi 13C 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Redmi 13C 4G
Redmi 13C 4G
-
Helio G85
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.74"
720x1600 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
4GB 256GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 256GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, 28mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
0.08 MP
(auxiliary lens)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.0
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo Y300 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Redmi 13C 4G with the Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both phones offer the same 2 years of OS update support. For security updates, Redmi 13C 4G offers 4 years of support compared to Vivo Y300's 3 years.
Vivo Y300 features a superior AMOLED display, while Redmi 13C 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo Y300 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Vivo Y300 also boasts a brighter screen with 1800 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo Y300 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo Y300 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 18W on Redmi 13C 4G.
Vivo Y300 includes an IP64 rating, while Redmi 13C 4G lacks an official IP rating.
- Vivo Y300 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.