Redmi A3 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A35 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A35
Samsung Galaxy A35
-
Exynos 1380
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.6"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
3GB 64GB (eMMC 5.1)
4GB 64GB (eMMC 5.1)
4GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
6GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/2.0, (wide)
0.08 MP
(auxiliary lens)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N26, N28, N66
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A35 with the Exynos 1380 (5nm) performs better than the Redmi A3 4G with the Mediatek Helio G36 (12nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 offers 4 years of OS updates, while the Redmi A3 4G provides 2 years. When it comes to security updates, Samsung Galaxy A35 leads with 5 years of support.
Samsung Galaxy A35 has a superior AMOLED display, while Redmi A3 4G uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Samsung Galaxy A35 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. Samsung Galaxy A35 also has a brighter display with 1000 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Samsung Galaxy A35 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Both phones have the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A35 supports faster wired charging at 25W.
Samsung Galaxy A35 has an IP67 rating, while Redmi A3 4G lacks official water and dust resistance.