Redmi A3 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
3GB 64GB (eMMC 5.1)
4GB 64GB (eMMC 5.1)
4GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
6GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/2.0, (wide)
0.08 MP
(auxiliary lens)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41
TDD N40 / N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Vivo Y300 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Redmi A3 4G with the Mediatek Helio G36 (12nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Both phones offer the same OS update support and receive security updates for the same duration.
Vivo Y300 has a superior AMOLED display, while Redmi A3 4G uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Vivo Y300 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. Vivo Y300 also has a brighter display with 1800 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo Y300 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Both phones have the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo Y300 supports faster wired charging at 80W.
Vivo Y300 has an IP64 rating, while Redmi A3 4G lacks official water and dust resistance.