Redmi A3 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
3GB 64GB (eMMC 5.1)
4GB 64GB (eMMC 5.1)
4GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
6GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/2.0, (wide)
0.08 MP
(auxiliary lens)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo Y300 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Redmi A3 4G with the Mediatek Helio G36 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Redmi A3 4G and Vivo Y300 offer the same software support — 2 years of OS updates and 3 years of security updates.
Vivo Y300 features a superior AMOLED display, while Redmi A3 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo Y300 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Vivo Y300 also boasts a brighter screen with 1800 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo Y300 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo Y300 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 10W on Redmi A3 4G.
Vivo Y300 includes an IP64 rating, while Redmi A3 4G lacks an official IP rating.
- Redmi A3 4G – Check price here
- Vivo Y300 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.