Redmi A3 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y39 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
3GB 64GB (eMMC 5.1)
4GB 64GB (eMMC 5.1)
4GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
6GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/2.0, (wide)
0.08 MP
(auxiliary lens)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo Y39 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Redmi A3 4G with the Mediatek Helio G36 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Redmi A3 4G and Vivo Y39 offer the same software support — 2 years of OS updates and 3 years of security updates.
Both Redmi A3 4G and Vivo Y39 use LCD screens. In terms of smoothness, Vivo Y39 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Vivo Y39 also boasts a brighter screen with 1000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Vivo Y39 features a larger 6500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo Y39 also supports faster wired charging at 44W, compared to 10W on Redmi A3 4G.
Vivo Y39 includes an IP64 rating, while Redmi A3 4G lacks an official IP rating.
- Redmi A3 4G – Check price here
- Vivo Y39 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.