Redmi A3x 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Redmi A3x 4G
Redmi A3x 4G
-
Unisoc T603
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.71"
720x1650 pixels
-
8 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75
1.6 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
4GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
f/2.0, (wide)
0.08 MP
(auxiliary lens)
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo X200 with its Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Redmi A3x 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T603 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo X200 offers 4 years of OS updates, whereas Redmi A3x 4G provides 2 years. For security updates, Vivo X200 offers 5 years of support compared to Redmi A3x 4G's 3 years.
Vivo X200 features a superior AMOLED display, while Redmi A3x 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo X200 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Vivo X200 also boasts a brighter screen with 4500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo X200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo X200 features a larger 5800 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo X200 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 10W on Redmi A3x 4G.
Vivo X200 includes an IP69 rating, while Redmi A3x 4G lacks an official IP rating.
- Redmi A3x 4G – Check price here
- Vivo X200 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.