Redmi A3x 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 Plus alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Redmi A3x 4G
Redmi A3x 4G
-
Unisoc T603
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.71"
720x1650 pixels
-
8 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
Vivo Y300 Plus
Vivo Y300 Plus
-
Snapdragon 695
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
44W
-
6.78"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75
1.6 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55
2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold
6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver
4GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
f/2.0, (wide)
0.08 MP
(auxiliary lens)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8
TDD: N77, N78
TDD N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Redmi A3x 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T603 (12nm) performs better than the Vivo Y300 Plus with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Both phones offer the same OS update support and receive security updates for the same duration.
Vivo Y300 Plus has a superior AMOLED display, while Redmi A3x 4G uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Vivo Y300 Plus offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. Vivo Y300 Plus also has a brighter display with 1300 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo Y300 Plus has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Both phones have the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo Y300 Plus supports faster wired charging at 44W.
Vivo Y300 Plus has an IP54 rating, while Redmi A3x 4G lacks official water and dust resistance.