Redmi A3x 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 Plus alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Redmi A3x 4G
Redmi A3x 4G
-
Unisoc T603
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.71"
720x1650 pixels
-
8 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Vivo Y300 Plus
Vivo Y300 Plus
-
Snapdragon 695
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
44W
-
6.78"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75
1.6 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55
2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold
6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver
4GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
f/2.0, (wide)
0.08 MP
(auxiliary lens)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
6 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Redmi A3x 4G with its Unisoc Unisoc T603 (12nm) performs better than the Vivo Y300 Plus with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Redmi A3x 4G and Vivo Y300 Plus offer the same software support — 2 years of OS updates and 3 years of security updates.
Vivo Y300 Plus features a superior AMOLED display, while Redmi A3x 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo Y300 Plus offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Vivo Y300 Plus also boasts a brighter screen with 1300 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo Y300 Plus offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo Y300 Plus also supports faster wired charging at 44W, compared to 10W on Redmi A3x 4G.
Vivo Y300 Plus includes an IP54 rating, while Redmi A3x 4G lacks an official IP rating.
- Vivo Y300 Plus – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.