Redmi A4 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
4GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
7 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41
In this performance comparison, the Vivo Y300 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Redmi A4 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both phones offer the same 2 years of OS update support. For security updates, Redmi A4 offers 4 years of support compared to Vivo Y300's 3 years.
Vivo Y300 features a superior AMOLED display, while Redmi A4 comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo Y300 also boasts a brighter screen with 1800 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo Y300 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Redmi A4 comes with a larger 5160 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Vivo Y300 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 18W on Redmi A4.
Vivo Y300 includes an IP64 rating, while Redmi A4 lacks an official IP rating.
- Redmi A4 – Check price here
- Vivo Y300 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.