Redmi A5 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Redmi A5 4G
Redmi A5 4G
-
Unisoc T7250
12 nm
-
5200 mAh
15W
-
6.88"
720 x 1640 pixels
-
32 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
4GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/2.0, (wide)
Auxiliary lens
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.0, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo Y300 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Redmi A5 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T7250 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both phones offer the same 2 years of OS update support. For security updates, Redmi A5 4G offers 4 years of support compared to Vivo Y300's 3 years.
Vivo Y300 features a superior AMOLED display, while Redmi A5 4G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo Y300 also boasts a brighter screen with 1800 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo Y300 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Redmi A5 4G comes with a larger 5200 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Vivo Y300 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 15W on Redmi A5 4G.
Vivo Y300 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP64 rating.
- Redmi A5 4G – Check price here
- Vivo Y300 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.