Redmi Note 13 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y29 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Redmi Note 13 Pro
Redmi Note 13 Pro
-
Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
4 nm
-
5100 mAh
67W
-
6.67"
1220x2712 pixels
-
200 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 512GB (UFS 2.2)
16GB 512GB (UFS 2.2)
6GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 256GB (eMMC 5.1)
f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
0.08 MP
f/3.0
1080p@30/60/120fps
f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
10 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Redmi Note 13 Pro with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Vivo Y29 with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Redmi Note 13 Pro launched with Android 13 and will receive updates until Android 16, whereas Vivo Y29 launched with Android 14 and will get Android 15. Both phones are expected to receive security updates until around 2027.
Redmi Note 13 Pro features a superior AMOLED display, while Vivo Y29 comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Redmi Note 13 Pro also boasts a brighter screen with 1800 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Redmi Note 13 Pro offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo Y29 features a larger 5500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Redmi Note 13 Pro also supports faster wired charging at 67W, compared to 44W on Vivo Y29.
Vivo Y29 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP64 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.