Redmi Note 13 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo T3 Ultra alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Redmi Note 13
Redmi Note 13
-
Dimensity 6080
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
33W
-
6.67"
1080x2400 pixels
-
108 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Vivo T3 Ultra
Vivo T3 Ultra
-
Dimensity 9200+
4 nm
-
5500 mAh
80W
-
6.78"
1260 x 2800 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30/60fps
- Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3
3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 512GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
12GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
1080p@30fps
f/2.4, (wide)
f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
7 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo T3 Ultra with its Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm) performs better than the Redmi Note 13 with the Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both phones launched with Android 13 and will get updates until Android 16. Redmi Note 13 will get security updates until 2028 (approx. 4 years), while Vivo T3 Ultra is supported till 2027.
Both Redmi Note 13 and Vivo T3 Ultra feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo T3 Ultra also boasts a brighter screen with 4500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo T3 Ultra offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo T3 Ultra features a larger 5500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo T3 Ultra also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 33W on Redmi Note 13.
Vivo T3 Ultra offers better protection against water and dust with an IP68 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.