Samsung Galaxy A05 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo V40 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A05 4G

Samsung Galaxy A05 4G
-
Helio G85
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
720x1600 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30/60fps
-
Specs
2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
4GB 128GB
6GB 128GB
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 512GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), AF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
f/2.0
f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
TDD N40 / N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Vivo V40 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy A05 4G with the Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
The Vivo V40 offers 3 years of OS updates, while the Samsung Galaxy A05 4G provides 2 years. These phones will receive the same duration of security updates.
Vivo V40 has a superior AMOLED display, while Samsung Galaxy A05 4G uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Vivo V40 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. Vivo V40 also has a brighter display with 4500 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo V40 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Vivo V40 has a larger 5500 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo V40 supports faster wired charging at 80W.
Vivo V40 has an IP68 rating, while Samsung Galaxy A05 4G lacks official water and dust resistance.