Samsung Galaxy A14 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo V40 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A14
Samsung Galaxy A14
-
Exynos 1330
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
15W
-
6.6"
1080 x 2408 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
4GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
6GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 512GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
f/2.0, (wide)
f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
10 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n40, n41, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo V40 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy A14 with the Exynos 1330 (5nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo V40 offers 3 years of OS updates, whereas Samsung Galaxy A14 provides 2 years. Both phones receive the same 4 years of security updates.
Vivo V40 features a superior AMOLED display, while Samsung Galaxy A14 comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo V40 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Vivo V40 also boasts a brighter screen with 4500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo V40 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo V40 features a larger 5500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo V40 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 15W on Samsung Galaxy A14.
Vivo V40 includes an IP68 rating, while Samsung Galaxy A14 lacks an official IP rating.
- Samsung Galaxy A14 – Check price here
- Vivo V40 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.