Samsung Galaxy A14 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A14

Samsung Galaxy A14
-
Exynos 1330
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
15W
-
6.6"
1080 x 2408 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
4GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
6GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p
f/2.0, (wide)
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this comparison, the Vivo X200 with the Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy A14 with the Exynos 1330 (5nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
The Vivo X200 offers 4 years of OS updates, while the Samsung Galaxy A14 provides 2 years. When it comes to security updates, Vivo X200 leads with 5 years of support.
Vivo X200 has a superior AMOLED display, while Samsung Galaxy A14 uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Vivo X200 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. Vivo X200 also has a brighter display with 4500 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo X200 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Vivo X200 has a larger 5800 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo X200 supports faster wired charging at 90W.
Vivo X200 has an IP69 rating, while Samsung Galaxy A14 lacks official water and dust resistance.