Samsung Galaxy A14 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A14
Samsung Galaxy A14
-
Exynos 1330
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
15W
-
6.6"
1080 x 2408 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
4GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
6GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.0, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo Y300 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy A14 with the Exynos 1330 (5nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both phones offer the same 2 years of OS update support. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy A14 offers 4 years of support compared to Vivo Y300's 3 years.
Vivo Y300 features a superior AMOLED display, while Samsung Galaxy A14 comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo Y300 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Vivo Y300 also boasts a brighter screen with 1800 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo Y300 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 15W on Samsung Galaxy A14.
Vivo Y300 includes an IP64 rating, while Samsung Galaxy A14 lacks an official IP rating.
- Samsung Galaxy A14 – Check price here
- Vivo Y300 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.