Samsung Galaxy A15 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A55 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A15
Samsung Galaxy A15
-
Dimensity 6100+
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.5"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Samsung Galaxy A55
Samsung Galaxy A55
-
Exynos 1480
4 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.6"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB
8GB 128GB
8GB 256GB
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
12GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
f/1.8, (wide), AF
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP
f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
5 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.0, (wide)
f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
12 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n26, n28, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
12 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n26, n28, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A55 with its Exynos 1480 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy A15 with the Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both phones launched with Android 14 and will get updates until Android 18. Samsung Galaxy A55 will get security updates until 2029 (approx. 5 years), while Samsung Galaxy A15 is supported till 2028.
Both Samsung Galaxy A15 and Samsung Galaxy A55 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. In terms of smoothness, Samsung Galaxy A55 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Samsung Galaxy A55 also boasts a brighter screen with 1000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Both devices support the same wired charging speed of 25W.
Samsung Galaxy A55 includes an IP67 rating, while Samsung Galaxy A15 lacks an official IP rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.