Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A16 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G
Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
Samsung Galaxy A16
Samsung Galaxy A16
-
Helio G99
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 256GB (UFS 2.0)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), AF
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N26, N28, N66
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A16 with the Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Samsung Galaxy A16 has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G uses an LCD panel. Moreover, it offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy A16 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Both phones have the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A16 supports faster wired charging at 25W.
Both phones have the same IP54 rating for water and dust resistance.