Samsung Galaxy A17 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y39 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A17
Samsung Galaxy A17
-
Exynos 1330
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
-
Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF, OIS
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro), 1/5.0", 1.75µm
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n6, n7, n8, n26, n28, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo Y39 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy A17 with the Exynos 1330 (5nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy A17 launched with Android 15 and will receive updates until Android 21, whereas Vivo Y39 launched with Android 15 and will get Android 17. Samsung Galaxy A17 will get security updates until 2031 (approx. 6 years), while Vivo Y39 is supported till 2028.
Samsung Galaxy A17 features a superior AMOLED display, while Vivo Y39 comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo Y39 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Vivo Y39 also boasts a brighter screen with 1000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Samsung Galaxy A17 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo Y39 features a larger 6500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo Y39 also supports faster wired charging at 44W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy A17.
Vivo Y39 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP64 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.