Samsung Galaxy A25 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y39 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A25
Samsung Galaxy A25
-
Exynos 1280
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.5"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30fps
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N26, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N26, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N66, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this comparison, the Vivo Y39 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 with the Exynos 1280 (5nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 offers 4 years of OS updates, while the Vivo Y39 provides 2 years. When it comes to security updates, Samsung Galaxy A25 leads with 5 years of support.
Samsung Galaxy A25 has a superior AMOLED display, while Vivo Y39 uses an LCD panel. They have the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo Y39 also has a brighter display with 1000 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Samsung Galaxy A25 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Vivo Y39 has a larger 6500 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo Y39 supports faster wired charging at 44W.
Vivo Y39 has an IP64 rating, while Samsung Galaxy A25 lacks official water and dust resistance.