Samsung Galaxy A25 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y39 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A25
Samsung Galaxy A25
-
Exynos 1280
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.5"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30fps
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
11 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n26, n28, n40, n41, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo Y39 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 with the Exynos 1280 (5nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy A25 offers 4 years of OS updates, whereas Vivo Y39 provides 2 years. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy A25 offers 5 years of support compared to Vivo Y39's 3 years.
Samsung Galaxy A25 features a superior AMOLED display, while Vivo Y39 comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo Y39 also boasts a brighter screen with 1000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Samsung Galaxy A25 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo Y39 features a larger 6500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo Y39 also supports faster wired charging at 44W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy A25.
Vivo Y39 includes an IP64 rating, while Samsung Galaxy A25 lacks an official IP rating.
- Vivo Y39 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.