Samsung Galaxy A26 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y39 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A26

Samsung Galaxy A26
-
Exynos 1380
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30fps
720p@480fps
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A26 with its Exynos 1380 (5nm) performs better than the Vivo Y39 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy A26 launched with Android 15 and will receive updates until Android 21, whereas Vivo Y39 launched with Android 15 and will get Android 17. Samsung Galaxy A26 will get security updates until 2031 (approx. 6 years), while Vivo Y39 is supported till 2028.
Samsung Galaxy A26 features a superior AMOLED display, while Vivo Y39 comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at 1000 nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy A26 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo Y39 features a larger 6500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo Y39 also supports faster wired charging at 44W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy A26.
Samsung Galaxy A26 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP67 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.