Samsung Galaxy A35 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A35
Samsung Galaxy A35
-
Exynos 1380
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.6"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
f/2.5, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
12 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n26, n28, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A35 with its Exynos 1380 (5nm) performs better than the Vivo Y300 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy A35 launched with Android 14 and will receive updates until Android 18, whereas Vivo Y300 launched with Android 14 and will get Android 16. Samsung Galaxy A35 will get security updates until 2029 (approx. 5 years), while Vivo Y300 is supported till 2027.
Both Samsung Galaxy A35 and Vivo Y300 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo Y300 also boasts a brighter screen with 1800 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo Y300 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy A35.
Samsung Galaxy A35 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP67 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.