Samsung Galaxy A36 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo T4 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A36

Samsung Galaxy A36
-
Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
4 nm
-
5000 mAh
45W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A720
3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, Sony IMX882, PDAF, OIS
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30/60fps
1080p@30fps
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.0, (wide)
1080p@30fps
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo T4 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy A36 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy A36 offers 6 years of OS updates, whereas Vivo T4 provides 2 years. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy A36 offers 6 years of support compared to Vivo T4's 3 years.
Both Samsung Galaxy A36 and Vivo T4 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo T4 also boasts a brighter screen with 5000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Vivo T4 features a larger 7300 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo T4 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 45W on Samsung Galaxy A36.
Samsung Galaxy A36 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP67 rating.
- Samsung Galaxy A36 – Check price here
- Vivo T4 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.