Samsung Galaxy F14 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F14 4G
Samsung Galaxy F14 4G
-
Snapdragon 680
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080x2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265
1.9 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide)
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.0, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo Y300 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy F14 4G with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both phones offer the same 2 years of OS update support. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy F14 4G offers 4 years of support compared to Vivo Y300's 3 years.
Vivo Y300 features a superior AMOLED display, while Samsung Galaxy F14 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo Y300 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo Y300 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy F14 4G.
Vivo Y300 includes an IP64 rating, while Samsung Galaxy F14 4G lacks an official IP rating.
- Vivo Y300 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.