Samsung Galaxy F14 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F14 4G

Samsung Galaxy F14 4G
-
Snapdragon 680
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080x2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265
1.9 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide)
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.0, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41
TDD N40 / N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Vivo Y300 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy F14 4G with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
They offer the same OS update support. When it comes to security updates, Samsung Galaxy F14 4G leads with 4 years of support.
Vivo Y300 has a superior AMOLED display, while Samsung Galaxy F14 4G uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Vivo Y300 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. These phones have the same resolution.
Both phones have the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo Y300 supports faster wired charging at 80W.
Vivo Y300 has an IP64 rating, while Samsung Galaxy F14 4G lacks official water and dust resistance.