Samsung Galaxy F14 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 Plus alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F14 4G
Samsung Galaxy F14 4G
-
Snapdragon 680
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080x2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Vivo Y300 Plus
Vivo Y300 Plus
-
Snapdragon 695
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
44W
-
6.78"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265
1.9 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265
2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold
6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver
f/1.8, (wide)
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.0, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8
TDD: N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo Y300 Plus with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy F14 4G with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both phones offer the same 2 years of OS update support. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy F14 4G offers 4 years of support compared to Vivo Y300 Plus's 3 years.
Vivo Y300 Plus features a superior AMOLED display, while Samsung Galaxy F14 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo Y300 Plus offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo Y300 Plus also supports faster wired charging at 44W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy F14 4G.
Vivo Y300 Plus includes an IP54 rating, while Samsung Galaxy F14 4G lacks an official IP rating.
- Vivo Y300 Plus – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.