Samsung Galaxy F14 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo V40 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F14
Samsung Galaxy F14
-
Exynos 1330
5 nm
-
6000 mAh
25W
-
6.6"
1080x2408 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
6GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 512GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
f/2.0, (wide)
f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo V40 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy F14 with the Exynos 1330 (5nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo V40 launched with Android 14 and will receive updates until Android 17, whereas Samsung Galaxy F14 launched with Android 13 and will get Android 15. Vivo V40 will get security updates until 2028 (approx. 4 years), while Samsung Galaxy F14 is supported till 2027.
Vivo V40 features a superior AMOLED display, while Samsung Galaxy F14 comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo V40 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo V40 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Samsung Galaxy F14 comes with a larger 6000 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Vivo V40 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy F14.
Vivo V40 includes an IP68 rating, while Samsung Galaxy F14 lacks an official IP rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.