Samsung Galaxy F14 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F14

Samsung Galaxy F14
-
Exynos 1330
5 nm
-
6000 mAh
25W
-
6.6"
1080x2408 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
6GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p
f/2.0, (wide)
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28, N66
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28, N66
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this comparison, the Vivo X200 with the Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy F14 with the Exynos 1330 (5nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
The Vivo X200 offers 4 years of OS updates, while the Samsung Galaxy F14 provides 2 years. When it comes to security updates, Vivo X200 leads with 5 years of support.
Vivo X200 has a superior AMOLED display, while Samsung Galaxy F14 uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Vivo X200 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo X200 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Samsung Galaxy F14 has a larger 6000 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo X200 supports faster wired charging at 90W.
Vivo X200 has an IP69 rating, while Samsung Galaxy F14 lacks official water and dust resistance.