Samsung Galaxy F14 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F14
Samsung Galaxy F14
-
Exynos 1330
5 nm
-
6000 mAh
25W
-
6.6"
1080x2408 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.0, (wide)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41
In this performance comparison, the Vivo Y300 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy F14 with the Exynos 1330 (5nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both phones offer the same 2 years of OS update support. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy F14 offers 4 years of support compared to Vivo Y300's 3 years.
Vivo Y300 features a superior AMOLED display, while Samsung Galaxy F14 comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo Y300 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Samsung Galaxy F14 comes with a larger 6000 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Vivo Y300 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy F14.
Vivo Y300 includes an IP64 rating, while Samsung Galaxy F14 lacks an official IP rating.
- Vivo Y300 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.