Samsung Galaxy F16 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 Plus alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F16
Samsung Galaxy F16
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Vivo Y300 Plus
Vivo Y300 Plus
-
Snapdragon 695
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
44W
-
6.78"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold
6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver
6GB 128GB
8GB 128GB
f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
11 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n28, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
6 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo Y300 Plus with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy F16 with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F16 launched with Android 15 and will receive updates until Android 21, whereas Vivo Y300 Plus launched with Android 14 and will get Android 16. Samsung Galaxy F16 will get security updates until 2031 (approx. 6 years), while Vivo Y300 Plus is supported till 2027.
Both Samsung Galaxy F16 and Vivo Y300 Plus feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. In terms of smoothness, Vivo Y300 Plus offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Vivo Y300 Plus also boasts a brighter screen with 1300 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo Y300 Plus also supports faster wired charging at 44W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy F16.
Both phones feature the same IP54 rating for water and dust resistance.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.