Samsung Galaxy F16 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y39 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F16
Samsung Galaxy F16
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB
8GB 128GB
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
11 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n28, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo Y39 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy F16 with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F16 offers 6 years of OS updates, whereas Vivo Y39 provides 2 years. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy F16 offers 6 years of support compared to Vivo Y39's 3 years.
Samsung Galaxy F16 features a superior AMOLED display, while Vivo Y39 comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo Y39 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Vivo Y39 also boasts a brighter screen with 1000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Samsung Galaxy F16 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo Y39 features a larger 6500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo Y39 also supports faster wired charging at 44W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy F16.
Vivo Y39 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP64 rating.
- Vivo Y39 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.