Samsung Galaxy F17 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo T4x alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F17
Samsung Galaxy F17
-
Exynos 1330
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB
8GB 128GB (UFS 3.1)
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF, OIS, Up to 10x Digital Zoom
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro), 1/5.0", 1.75µm
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
gyro-EIS
1080p@30fps
f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
f/2.1, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n6, n7, n8, n26, n28, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo T4x with its Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy F17 with the Exynos 1330 (5nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F17 offers 6 years of OS updates, whereas Vivo T4x provides 2 years. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy F17 offers 6 years of support compared to Vivo T4x's 3 years.
Samsung Galaxy F17 features a superior AMOLED display, while Vivo T4x comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo T4x offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Samsung Galaxy F17 also boasts a brighter screen with 1100 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Vivo T4x features a larger 6500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo T4x also supports faster wired charging at 44W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy F17.
Vivo T4x offers better protection against water and dust with an IP64 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.