Samsung Galaxy F34 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
vivo T4 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F34

Samsung Galaxy F34
-
Exynos 1280
5 nm
-
6000 mAh
25W
-
6.5"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
vivo T4 Pro

vivo T4 Pro
-
Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
4 nm
-
6500 mAh
90W
-
6.77"
1080 x 2392 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x2.8 GHz Cortex-720
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-720
3x1.8 GHz Cortex-520
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP
f/2.4
f/1.79, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, Sony IMX882, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.65, 73mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, Sony IMX882, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom, 100x Digital Zoom
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30fps
1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, OIS
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.45, 30mm (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
10 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41, n78
11 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the vivo T4 Pro with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy F34 with the Exynos 1280 (5nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both phones offer the same 4 years of OS update support. For security updates, vivo T4 Pro offers 6 years of support compared to Samsung Galaxy F34's 5 years.
Both Samsung Galaxy F34 and vivo T4 Pro feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. vivo T4 Pro also boasts a brighter screen with 5000 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
vivo T4 Pro features a larger 6500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. vivo T4 Pro also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy F34.
vivo T4 Pro offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
- Samsung Galaxy F34 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.