Samsung Galaxy F34 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo V40 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F34
Samsung Galaxy F34
-
Exynos 1280
5 nm
-
6000 mAh
25W
-
6.5"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 512GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP
f/2.4
f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
1080p@30fps
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
10 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo V40 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy F34 with the Exynos 1280 (5nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both phones launched with Android 13 and will get updates until Android 17. Both phones are expected to receive security updates until around 2028.
Both Samsung Galaxy F34 and Vivo V40 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo V40 also boasts a brighter screen with 4500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo V40 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Samsung Galaxy F34 comes with a larger 6000 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Vivo V40 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy F34.
Vivo V40 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP68 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.