Samsung Galaxy F34 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F34

Samsung Galaxy F34
-
Exynos 1280
5 nm
-
6000 mAh
25W
-
6.5"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP
f/2.4
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
1080p
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this comparison, the Vivo X200 with the Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy F34 with the Exynos 1280 (5nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Both phones offer the same OS update support and receive security updates for the same duration.
Both phones feature AMOLED displays. They have the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo X200 also has a brighter display with 4500 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo X200 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Samsung Galaxy F34 has a larger 6000 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo X200 supports faster wired charging at 90W.
Vivo X200 offers better water and dust resistance with an IP69 rating.