Samsung Galaxy F36 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Pova Slim alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F36

Samsung Galaxy F36
-
Exynos 1380
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
Tecno Pova Slim

Tecno Pova Slim
-
Dimensity 6400
6 nm
-
5160 mAh
45W
-
6.78"
1224 x 2720 pixels
-
50 MP
1440p@30fps
-
Specs
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.79, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
1080p@30/60fps
720p@480fps, gyro-EIS
1080p@30fps
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
f/2.0, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
9 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41, n78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy F36 with its Exynos 1380 (5nm) performs better than the Tecno Pova Slim with the Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F36 offers 6 years of OS updates, whereas Tecno Pova Slim provides 1 years. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy F36 offers 6 years of support compared to Tecno Pova Slim's 2 years.
Both Samsung Galaxy F36 and Tecno Pova Slim feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. In terms of smoothness, Tecno Pova Slim offers a higher 144 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Tecno Pova Slim offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Tecno Pova Slim features a larger 5160 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Tecno Pova Slim also supports faster wired charging at 45W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy F36.
Tecno Pova Slim includes an IP64 rating, while Samsung Galaxy F36 lacks an official IP rating.
- Tecno Pova Slim – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.