Samsung Galaxy F36 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Spark 30C alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F36
Samsung Galaxy F36
-
Exynos 1380
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
Tecno Spark 30C
Tecno Spark 30C
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
48 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB
4GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
(wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF
1080p@30/60fps
720p@480fps, gyro-EIS
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N78
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N78
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy F36 with its Exynos 1380 (5nm) performs better than the Tecno Spark 30C with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F36 features a superior AMOLED display, while Tecno Spark 30C comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy F36 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy F36 also supports faster wired charging at 25W, compared to 18W on Tecno Spark 30C.
Tecno Spark 30C includes an IP54 rating, while Samsung Galaxy F36 lacks an official IP rating.
- Tecno Spark 30C – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.