Samsung Galaxy F36 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F36
Samsung Galaxy F36
-
Exynos 1380
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
8GB 128GB
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30/60fps
720p@480fps, gyro-EIS
1080p
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30fps
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
9 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo X200 with its Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy F36 with the Exynos 1380 (5nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F36 offers 6 years of OS updates, whereas Vivo X200 provides 4 years. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy F36 offers 6 years of support compared to Vivo X200's 5 years.
Both Samsung Galaxy F36 and Vivo X200 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo X200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo X200 features a larger 5800 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo X200 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy F36.
Vivo X200 includes an IP69 rating, while Samsung Galaxy F36 lacks an official IP rating.
- Vivo X200 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.