Samsung Galaxy F36 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 Plus alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F36
Samsung Galaxy F36
-
Exynos 1380
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
Vivo Y300 Plus
Vivo Y300 Plus
-
Snapdragon 695
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
44W
-
6.78"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold
6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver
8GB 128GB
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30/60fps
720p@480fps, gyro-EIS
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
f/2.5, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
9 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41, n78
6 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy F36 with its Exynos 1380 (5nm) performs better than the Vivo Y300 Plus with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F36 offers 6 years of OS updates, whereas Vivo Y300 Plus provides 2 years. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy F36 offers 6 years of support compared to Vivo Y300 Plus's 3 years.
Both Samsung Galaxy F36 and Vivo Y300 Plus feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo Y300 Plus also supports faster wired charging at 44W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy F36.
Vivo Y300 Plus includes an IP54 rating, while Samsung Galaxy F36 lacks an official IP rating.
- Vivo Y300 Plus – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.