Samsung Galaxy F55 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y29 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F55

Samsung Galaxy F55
-
Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
4 nm
-
5000 mAh
45W
-
6.7"
1080x2400 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710
3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
6GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 256GB (eMMC 5.1)
(f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS)
8 MP
(f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide))
2 MP
(f/2.4, (macro))
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
0.08 MP
f/3.0
1080p@30/60fps
(f/2.4, (wide))
f/2.0, (wide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28, N66
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28, N66
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy F55 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm) performs better than the Vivo Y29 with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F55 offers 4 years of OS updates, whereas Vivo Y29 provides 1 years. For security updates, Samsung Galaxy F55 offers 5 years of support compared to Vivo Y29's 3 years.
Samsung Galaxy F55 features a superior AMOLED display, while Vivo Y29 comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at 1000 nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy F55 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo Y29 features a larger 5500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Samsung Galaxy F55 also supports faster wired charging at 45W, compared to 44W on Vivo Y29.
Samsung Galaxy F55 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP67 rating.
- Samsung Galaxy F55 – Check price here
- Vivo Y29 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.