Samsung Galaxy M06 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy M06
Samsung Galaxy M06
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.74"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N26, N28, N66
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N26, N28, N66
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this comparison, the Vivo Y300 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy M06 with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
The Samsung Galaxy M06 offers 4 years of OS updates, while the Vivo Y300 provides 2 years. When it comes to security updates, Samsung Galaxy M06 leads with 4 years of support.
Vivo Y300 has a superior AMOLED display, while Samsung Galaxy M06 uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Vivo Y300 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. Vivo Y300 also has a brighter display with 1800 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo Y300 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Both phones have the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo Y300 supports faster wired charging at 80W.
Vivo Y300 has an IP64 rating, while Samsung Galaxy M06 lacks official water and dust resistance.