Samsung Galaxy M14 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo V50 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy M14 4G

Samsung Galaxy M14 4G
-
Snapdragon 680
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30/60fps
-
Specs
4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold
4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
6GB 128GB
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 512GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
f/2.0, (wide)
f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N66, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N66, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo V50 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo V50 offers 3 years of OS updates, whereas Samsung Galaxy M14 4G provides 2 years. Both phones receive the same 4 years of security updates.
Vivo V50 features a superior AMOLED display, while Samsung Galaxy M14 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo V50 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Vivo V50 also boasts a brighter screen with 4500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Vivo V50 features a larger 6000 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo V50 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 25W on Samsung Galaxy M14 4G.
Vivo V50 includes an IP69 rating, while Samsung Galaxy M14 4G lacks an official IP rating.
- Samsung Galaxy M14 4G – Check price here
- Vivo V50 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.